mNo edit summary  |
No edit summary  |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Forumheader|Wowpedia general}} |
||
| − | {{Stub/Mob}} |
||
| + | <!-- Please put your content under this paragraph. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> |
||
| − | The most powerful type of [[voidwalker]] yet encountered, they are gigantic and armor-plated. and itself are of this type. |
||
| + | What are everyone's thoughts on Ashbear160? If you have any questions, refer to his [[Special:Contributions/Ashbear160|contributions]], his [[User talk:Ashbear160|talk page]], or simply discuss it here. |
||
| − | == Known void lords == |
||
| − | * [[Dimensius]] |
||
| − | * [[Pandemonius]] |
||
| − | * [[Void Baron Galaxis]] |
||
| + | Also, please review some points of our [[Wowpedia:Disruptive editing policy|disruptive editing policy]]: |
||
| − | [[Category:Voidwalkers]] |
||
| + | |||
| + | * their edits are largely confined to talk-pages, such disruption may not directly harm an article, but it often prevents other editors from reaching consensus on how to improve an article |
||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Does not engage in consensus building: |
||
| + | ** repeatedly disregards other editors' questions or requests for explanations concerning edits or objections to edits; |
||
| + | ** repeatedly disregards other editors' explanations for their edits. |
||
| + | * '''Rejects community input''': resists moderation and/or requests for comment, continuing to edit in pursuit of a certain point despite an opposing consensus from impartial editors. |
||
| + | |||
| + | Does anyone have a problem with him? Does anyone have any compliments for him? Also, I can not stress enough that this is not about him, this is about his contributions and edits to the wiki, be they good or bad.--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 20:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :I've been asking for opinions... and i explained myself when asked, and i don't disregard other's opinions, if i did disregard other opinions, things would've been a lot messier.--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 20:58, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ::If this is about the organization page, we were talking i made my point, the page is too big for a single list and i personally think it should be divided, and proposed various solutions i'm waiting for your answer.--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 21:01, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :::I believe this is more than about the organization page. It's about overall contributions throughout the wiki. And it's not that you ask questions, questions are often a good thing, it shows interest, but sometimes you'll ask questions about something that involves mass edits, and then perform said changes without waiting for a response.. sometimes a minute after you ask what people would think of the change you're looking to do. Don't get me wrong, it's good to [[be bold]] and not "ask for permission" to do things, certain things however should be discussed... before they are done. {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 22:15, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Ok then, good thing i set up that discussion in the forums(still haven't got an answer), It's just that most of the times i won't get an answer unless i do a edit first, and if it's disagreed the edit can always be reverted.--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 22:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | I have a problem that Ashbear160 are doing WoW-related edits even though he doesn't play WoW, have an obsession with certain articles and subjects and doing widespread edits related to them, makes edits and requests that are non-essential to the improvements of the wiki, and in general being an annoyance. I don't want to compare him to a certain troublesome previous (now perma-banned) editor, but this is the last straw. --{{User:Gourra/Sig2}} 14:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 14:21, 13 July 2011
Forums: Village pump → Thoughts on Ashbear160
What are everyone's thoughts on Ashbear160? If you have any questions, refer to his contributions, his talk page, or simply discuss it here.
Also, please review some points of our disruptive editing policy:
- their edits are largely confined to talk-pages, such disruption may not directly harm an article, but it often prevents other editors from reaching consensus on how to improve an article
- Does not engage in consensus building:
- repeatedly disregards other editors' questions or requests for explanations concerning edits or objections to edits;
- repeatedly disregards other editors' explanations for their edits.
- Rejects community input: resists moderation and/or requests for comment, continuing to edit in pursuit of a certain point despite an opposing consensus from impartial editors.
Does anyone have a problem with him? Does anyone have any compliments for him? Also, I can not stress enough that this is not about him, this is about his contributions and edits to the wiki, be they good or bad.--SWM2448 20:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- I've been asking for opinions... and i explained myself when asked, and i don't disregard other's opinions, if i did disregard other opinions, things would've been a lot messier.--Ashbear160 (talk) 20:58, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- If this is about the organization page, we were talking i made my point, the page is too big for a single list and i personally think it should be divided, and proposed various solutions i'm waiting for your answer.--Ashbear160 (talk) 21:01, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- I believe this is more than about the organization page. It's about overall contributions throughout the wiki. And it's not that you ask questions, questions are often a good thing, it shows interest, but sometimes you'll ask questions about something that involves mass edits, and then perform said changes without waiting for a response.. sometimes a minute after you ask what people would think of the change you're looking to do. Don't get me wrong, it's good to be bold and not "ask for permission" to do things, certain things however should be discussed... before they are done.
(Sssss/Slithered) 22:15, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- I believe this is more than about the organization page. It's about overall contributions throughout the wiki. And it's not that you ask questions, questions are often a good thing, it shows interest, but sometimes you'll ask questions about something that involves mass edits, and then perform said changes without waiting for a response.. sometimes a minute after you ask what people would think of the change you're looking to do. Don't get me wrong, it's good to be bold and not "ask for permission" to do things, certain things however should be discussed... before they are done.
- Ok then, good thing i set up that discussion in the forums(still haven't got an answer), It's just that most of the times i won't get an answer unless i do a edit first, and if it's disagreed the edit can always be reverted.--Ashbear160 (talk) 22:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
I have a problem that Ashbear160 are doing WoW-related edits even though he doesn't play WoW, have an obsession with certain articles and subjects and doing widespread edits related to them, makes edits and requests that are non-essential to the improvements of the wiki, and in general being an annoyance. I don't want to compare him to a certain troublesome previous (now perma-banned) editor, but this is the last straw. --g0urra[T҂C] 14:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)