Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
No edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:
 
== Minor Edits ==
 
== Minor Edits ==
   
Changed "In macros and the Bongos add-on" to "In macros and some action bar addons" since Bongos is out of date and shouldn't really be specifically mentioned. Also changed the location of the threat link, since it seems customary to link the first instance of the word. 01:00, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
+
Changed "In macros and the Bongos add-on" to "In macros and some action bar add-ons" since Bongos is out of date and shouldn't really be specifically mentioned. Also changed the location of the threat link, since it seems customary to link the first instance of the word. 01:00, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:01, 17 May 2009

The Druid must have one more stance, Cat Form - Prowl, corresponding to a rogue's Stealth being a stance. Madkaugh (talk) 02:38, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Nope. for macros use [stealth] Cowlinator (talk)

Can anyone confirm/update plz if warlocks demon form is considered a stance for macros? Cowlinator (talk) 02:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

fixed Cowlinator (talk)

Death Knight

I can find no evidence anywhere that DK presences are treated like stances by the game, or where 1=blood 2=frost etc came from. The [stance] macro conditional does not seem to work with presences at all. --Cowlinator (talk) 08:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

They worked for me. User:Jormungand01/sig 17:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Dang, I swear I tested it and it didn't work. Don't I feel dumb now... -Cowlinator (talk) 00:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
I have tested it just now, and stance conditionals (other than [nostance] which appears to always be true for Death Knights) do not work for Death Knight presences. Can someone else test it, and if you have a macro that works using a [stance:x] conditional, post that macro here? Otherwise I'll check back in a week or so and delete the Death Knight column. -Nandini (talk) 05:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
They do not work for the [stance] conditional in macros. Don't understand why not, seems rather biased against DKs to limit that ability. I only found this out as i was helping a friend warrior work on his macros and expected to be able to test the logic for him on my DK. -- Zeal (T/C)  13:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Hunter and paladin?

A hunter's Aspects and a paladin's Auras don't count as stances? --Azaram (talk) 05:07, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Hunter's Aspects don't appear on the special stances bar, so they don't count as stances. I'm not sure about paladin Auras, but if they appear on that bar then by all means put them in. Jormungand01 IconSmall Rogue talk · contribs 09:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
I dunno, I don't use a standard UI, so I don't even know what the bar would look like... I was asking, not complaining. --Azaram (talk) 11:49, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Paladin auras are definitively not stances, even though they appear on the "Special Action Bar". Whether or not a spell appears on this bar has no direct relationship to whether a stance is associated with that spell. -Nandini (talk) 06:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Minor Edits

Changed "In macros and the Bongos add-on" to "In macros and some action bar add-ons" since Bongos is out of date and shouldn't really be specifically mentioned. Also changed the location of the threat link, since it seems customary to link the first instance of the word. 01:00, 17 May 2009 (UTC)