Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
Advertisement

When choosing a race, should it be noted that people tend to choose Alliance races more often than Horde? Perhaps this is because people identify Alliance with the "good guys" and Horde with the "bad guys." --Fandyllic

Or, on top of that, they want to be on the side with the most players because they're a bunch of zerging newbs...or not. For the Horde!

Why have u put a Author(s) section? A normal wiki web site don t have signature in article (if the article don`t have copyright) !!

I kind of mentioned the Horde/Alliance discrepency in the picking a server section. The one friend of mine that plays Alliance told me he heard the Alliance quests and territories were just better done and more streamlined. And I agree about the authors section. It's shouldn't be there, but whatever. ---Spork

Parties section

I propose moving nearly the entire Parties section to Category:Partying. I wouldn't want to do that without asking first, and I don't know if that category will likely get much attention, but there are some tips for party roles that are good and important. For instance, I have macros that say who I'm healing. That's very important if you think about it. Mages should have macros that say who they're polymorphing, etc. What "party role" would a mage have, in light of polymorph? Caster? Perhaps Support, which is not currently an article as are healer and caster and tank, etc. -- D. F. Schmidt talk 04:08, 25 Aug 2005 (EDT)

hybrid/non-hybrid

Shouldn't Warlocks be hyrbid and Rogues non-hybrid? Warlocks can off-tank with Demonology, go debuff crazy with Affliction, or do DPS with Destruction, but Rogues are purely physical DPS, just in different styles. I think those descriptions ought to be changed, as I usually have a much easier time finding groups as a Rogue than a Warlock. --Dreyfuss of Durotan 14:35, 1 Feb 2006 (EST)

Advertisement