Trivia : I don't see this being amazingly relevant to the article. i vote remove.  - CJ talk / cont  11:38, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Better sorting Edit

As a player new to high end content, I would like to say this page could perhaps better be sorted by bracket (60, 70, 80). I cannot see a pattern in the current sort (Shadowmourne should be top or bottom).

Unless I am missing something quite obvious?

Also, perhaps items that can no longer be obtained are better off in a separate, lower section to avoid confusion from a game perspective. There is little Lore here anyway, so the data is more for nostalgia. Francis2559 (talk) 20:52, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

The current sort is alphabetical. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:10, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
Ahh, thank you very much. I think alphabetical sorting helps if you know what you are looking for by name. But then a user would just search for the item and miss this page. If they are not sure how to spell it, this would help.
I only found the page because I wanted to know what legendaries are available for 80's. Few users are going for lower level gear at all anyway, though it's possible. This would keep relevant data more accessible. I think that this is a more common need for this page, and so a (80, 70, 60, unavailable) bracketing makes more sense. Francis2559 (talk) 17:10, December 15, 2009 (UTC)