Hares are not rabbits. Rolandius (talk - contr) 08:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Close enough to share a category. {T •C ) 08:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- They do intend share the same model... why would they create two models for such little differences. Same with wolves and worgs, frogs and toads, and any other similar creatures. {T •C ) 21:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe I am thinking of "skins" then. The hares look like they have longer ears than rabbits. Also, on Wowhead I didn't see a "same model as" for them. Rolandius (talk - contr) 03:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- I guess the category could be rabbits but I still think the race should be hare. Saying a hare is a rabbit is: 1) wrong. 2) saying a lion seal is a sea lion or a hawk is an eagle because they look similiar. Rolandius (talk - contr) 03:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- You can place hare in race= all you want, but just leave the category as is. As for skins, they use the same as well. Infact, bliz has only 3 skins for rabbits/hares in the game -- RabbitSkin, RabbitSkinwhite, and RabbitSkinBrown.
- Also, don't rely on wowhead to show you same model as all the time, I'm not sure why they do that for some and not others, but they don't seem to have every mob/npc covered with that section. {T •C ) 07:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Location
The mob "Hare" is only found in Durotar. What is so hard about that? This isn't a page only on "hares" the animal. Rolandius (talk - contr) 04:49, 14 January 2009 (UTC)