TOC[]
Replaced the original TOC with a table, that way the excessively long TOC could be spread out horizontally instead of vertically. Aleandar 13:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Usefulness[]
I'm contemplating the usefulness of this page. On the one hand, we did vote to delete Burning Crusade raid instance bosses. On the other hand, this is linked from the main page. That suggests it has some value, at least, though there's probably a better, neater solution. Thoughts? -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 16:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. With the TBC page there's a decent amount of overlap with Adventure Guide Burning Crusade raids, but you can't really say the same here since a much larger amount of Classic instances have been updated or revamped in retail compared to TBC. I guess we could keep this page but modernize the 2007-era layout to be more in the style of the Adventure Guide pages or world boss or something. --
DeludedTroll (talk • contribs) 17:28, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe something like this then? Though it admittedly does look odd without icons for the ZG bosses. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 18:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- True, and using the Adventure Guide format probably creates a lot of unnecessary empty space, plus the fact that several of the Adventure Guide icons are inaccurate to how those bosses look in Classic (specifically Golemagg, Faerlina, and Noth). It makes sense to use the format on Adventure Guide Classic raids because it's consistent with other Adventure Guide pages and because I guess there's the hope that Blizzard will eventually fill in the lore entries for Classic, TBC, and WotLK raids, something that'll (presumably) never happen in Classic. Maybe it'd be better to go with a more simplistic version, like the revamp of the world boss page. -- DeludedTroll (talk • contribs) 19:04, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Unpopular opinion, what about a gallery with links for the images? — Surafbrov T / C 23:31, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Feel free to sandbox it if you like, but at least on paper that sounds like the worst of both worlds. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:38, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Unpopular opinion, what about a gallery with links for the images? — Surafbrov T / C 23:31, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- True, and using the Adventure Guide format probably creates a lot of unnecessary empty space, plus the fact that several of the Adventure Guide icons are inaccurate to how those bosses look in Classic (specifically Golemagg, Faerlina, and Noth). It makes sense to use the format on Adventure Guide Classic raids because it's consistent with other Adventure Guide pages and because I guess there's the hope that Blizzard will eventually fill in the lore entries for Classic, TBC, and WotLK raids, something that'll (presumably) never happen in Classic. Maybe it'd be better to go with a more simplistic version, like the revamp of the world boss page. --
- Maybe something like this then? Though it admittedly does look odd without icons for the ZG bosses. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 18:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
