- Mal Intent, you have no business editing other guild's descriptions, keep your opinions to your own guild. As the last guildmaster it's suitable that I update the page with correct information. There was already one edit war involving your guild, don't start one with others, I imagine the admins are pretty tired of this nonsense as well. Priority 14
- 00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Malicious Intent does indeed have members who came from Renascor. However, the way Malicious Intents guild description reads, makes it sound like Malicious Intent is a new Renascor, or that Renascor is now less than they were before those few members left. The Renascor guild master is still the same person, and the guild is still the same as it was before. Malicious Intent is not a part of Renascor. It is for this reason, that I have removed association to Renascor from Malicious Intents description.
Lets all move on with life, and be of our own creation. Lets not mislead players into thinking Malicious Intent is Renascor. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Horks (talk · contr).
- MI's founding members were all from renascor, all their officers are from renascor, 3 of their officers were officers in renascor. These are facts. When we say we're from renascor it means we were in renascor, a fact you cannot deny.
- This is not a semantics fight, we were in renascor for a long long time, we broke off, end of story. We are proud to be from renascor as we've stated since day one. No matter what you say it will not change the facts.
- Changing back to my original guild description, reporting again. Stop editing something that is not yours to edit. End of story. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bust (talk · contr).
- Reporting anyone won't resolve any problem in here. Either you guys come to an agreement on one description, or I remove the entire guild description from the page and block anyone attempting to add it back. I'll give you a week to sort that, being on your server, on your realm forums or on this very talk page, but I am not going to accept edit wars by any kind. --User:Adys/Sig 05:52, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
The guild description that i've posted time and time again is our official guild description approved by all officers of Malitious Intent. Why does an outsider get any say on what to put there? If i disgree with renascor's description of withstanding drama and edit that, how is that not vandalism? --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bust (talk · contr).
- This is very simple. I don't care about which description is official or not. All I want is the edit wars to stop. You both agree on ONE description, whichever one fits me, and the edit wars stop. If you can't do it this way, the guild description will entirely be removed and any attempt to add it back will result in a temporary block. That's the "other way" to prevent edit wars. --User:Adys/Sig 10:51, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
There has been no activity with Malicious Intent's guild description for 4 months, is it ok to remove this?--—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bust (talk · contr).
Bust, you are doing exactly what you complained about me doing before. This is not a position you can take. You have already argued for the protection of guild descriptions from edits. You can't change it just because you think it's misleading. I think i used the word misleading when talking about MIs description. I backed down then, and now you need to also.