Forums: Village pump → Glyph pages update
Ok, I started to update the Warrior articles a little while back, and it’s slowly growing into the mammoth task of updating the Class articles as a whole! Anyway I have just updated this article; Warrior_glyphs and would like your thoughts please – I think it’s much clearer than the original (have a look here Warlock glyphs for how all the pages are laid out at the moment) If I get positive feed back will update them all in a similar fashion. Wren (talk) 17:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
--Wren (talk) 17:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- I like the idea of having the left-most column span all of the primes, then span all of the majors, etc. Mage glyphs was done a bit differently by adding in the effect as a last column. I think it would be really cool to put the two ideas together. D.D. Corkum (T / C) 18:06, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I've changed Mage glyphs to reflect some of the work you did, notably the left column. D.D. Corkum (T / C) 23:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ok done Hunter glyphs it looks much better I believe! Wren (talk) 11:02, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Updated to Warrior glyphs standard
- ✓ Death knight glyphs
- ✓ Druid glyphs
- ✓ Hunter glyphs
- ✓ Mage glyphs
- ✓ Paladin glyphs
- ✓ Priest glyphs
- _ Rogue glyphs
- _ Shaman glyphs
- _ Warlock glyphs
- ✓ Warrior glyphs
- Add the checkmark (
✓
→ ✓), if you've updated it. -- Fandyllic (talk · contribs) 4:08 PM PST 29 Nov 2010
Request for no subcategories version
- Ok had some comments on the updated glyph pages, some people would prefer the glyphs not to have sub categories (i.e. Holy/Protection/Retribution) have a look at User:Wren/test4 and tell me what you prefer. Wren (talk) 13:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- I like the 2nd. At least for Priests, there are a few glyphs which are good for all 3 talent specs (shadowfiend, levitate, etc), which shouldn't be pigeonholed into 'Shadow' or 'Disc' when its good for any spec. Ressy (talk) 19:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'm going to change Priests to the 2nd version if theres no objection. Ressy (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- How about making the table transcluded, but you can pass a variable setting to make it show the subcategories or not... See Forum:Glyph_pages_update/Sandbox. You could make the default table show the subcategories version and have a link to it, but transclude the no subcategories version on the page.
- This way you could have both versions, but only maintain one table. Does this make sense? -- Fandyllic (talk · contribs) 2:33 PM PST 3 Dec 2010
- I would prefer to not have the subcategories. If we follow a format similar to Mage glyphs then this information could be passed on by adding a column, but I don't think it should be passed on as a header. This creates too many headers. D.D. Corkum (T / C) 01:41, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- Updated AND no talent tree subcategories