@DeletedUser40463526 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary  |
 |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Preventing Princess from healing== |
||
| − | An '''expansion''' is additional software (usually made available for retail sale) that adds new content and features to a game. |
||
| + | This is how my guild keeps Princess from healing, and it might be suggest that this be added to the page. |
||
| + | We setup a mage rotation of 3-4 mages. We use BigWigs to monitor when she heals (or look at it visually) and a member of the raid calls out over Vent/TS the next mage in the rotation. When she tries to heal, a mage casts Counterspell on Princess to stop the heal, then the mage leader calls out the next person to monitor Princess. This strategy basically prevents her from healing if executed correctly. Since the mages are not in melee of Princess, they cannot be feared and can cast the Counterspell even during a fear. |
||
| − | The content of an expansion is usually not available to anyone who does not own the expansion. Most expansions will not install or run as stand-alone products. |
||
| + | Just something to think about. |
||
| − | For example, the ''[[Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne|Frozen Throne]]'' expansion for ''[[Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos|Warcraft III]]'' added new campaigns, units, maps, and other content to the game. |
||
| + | --[[User:Cigawoot|Cigawoot]] 14:17, 22 September 2006 (EDT) |
||
| − | == |
+ | ==Bad wording== |
| + | There's a comment along the lines of "Since the last patch.." that I highly doubt means 3.0.2 at this point in time. I'd change it to a patch version myself, but I don't know which patch brought that change, so can someone take care of it? <small>—The preceding [[WoWWiki:Signature|unsigned]] comment was added by {{User|Sariko}}.</small> |
||
| + | ==Split?== |
||
| − | It was stated on an interview before the first expansion (possibly by [[Rob Pardo]]) that "We have made concepts for this expansion, and we already have enough ideas for 5-6 more". |
||
| + | It's been suggested this page be split to have 3 lore pages, one for each bug. |
||
| + | There's nothing to split, if you wish to make what is currently redirects to this article go ahead. I'm going to remove the split request soonish. {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 01:54, December 25, 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | [[Blizz]]ard has stated it plans to release one expansion per year for ''World of Warcraft''. Yet development of new expansions does seem to take significantly longer. |
||
| + | :To be fair, every single other multi-boss fight has articles for each boss involved, even when there's little reason to do so (see Twin Val'kyr, Twin Emperors, Eredar Twins, etc.) -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul|talk]]) 02:03, December 25, 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | There is an entry for popular [[expansion ideas|ideas about future expansions]]. |
||
| + | ::Aye, but nothing from this article can be split into other pages... minus the name of the mob. {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 02:33, December 25, 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | ==See also== |
||
| − | *''[[World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade]]'' (first expansion) |
||
| − | *''[[World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King]]'' (second expansion) |
||
| − | *''[[World of Warcraft: Cataclysm]]'' (third expansion) |
||
| + | :::Again, look at the Twin Val'kyr. They each have individual pages, both of which contain absolutely nothing besides a one-sentence description, an infobox, and a link to the fight page. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul|talk]]) 21:26, December 25, 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | See also: {{elink|type=wikipedia|link=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion|Expansion}} |
||
| + | ::::Please understand what I'm saying... if someone wants to create the pages (even if one line and a link to the fight) that's fine. What I'm saying is there's nothing to '''split''' from the this article and it was not correct to place a split stub here. {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 00:12, December 26, 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | [[pl:Expansion]] |
||
| + | :::::Aaaaaaaah. I did misunderstand what you were saying. Sorry 'bout that. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul|talk]]) 00:36, December 26, 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | [[Category:Game terms]] |
||
| + | |||
| − | [[Category:Glossary]] |
||
| + | == Move to Silithid Royalty? == |
||
| + | |||
| + | The raidinfo UI calls this encounter Silithid Royalty. Since I think this is the first official name we've gotten for the encounter (and it sounds worlds better than "Three Bugs"), should we move it there? -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul|talk]]) 21:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :If that's the case, then I don't have any objections to move it. --{{User:Gourra/Sig2}} 21:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ::...Looks like Kirkburn sysop protected four years ago and never lifted it, so I can't move it myself. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul|talk]]) 21:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :::By the way, can we confirm with the RaidUI bosses with speculative name? ACidmaw, the Val'kyr, the blood princes, and other? |
||
| + | :::{{User:A'noob/sig}} 21:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | ::::Sorry for the long delay, but here we go: Northrend Beasts, Val'kyr Twins, and Blood Council. Any others you're curious about? -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul|talk]]) 19:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 19:39, 11 October 2011
Preventing Princess from healing
This is how my guild keeps Princess from healing, and it might be suggest that this be added to the page.
We setup a mage rotation of 3-4 mages. We use BigWigs to monitor when she heals (or look at it visually) and a member of the raid calls out over Vent/TS the next mage in the rotation. When she tries to heal, a mage casts Counterspell on Princess to stop the heal, then the mage leader calls out the next person to monitor Princess. This strategy basically prevents her from healing if executed correctly. Since the mages are not in melee of Princess, they cannot be feared and can cast the Counterspell even during a fear.
Just something to think about. --Cigawoot 14:17, 22 September 2006 (EDT)
Bad wording
There's a comment along the lines of "Since the last patch.." that I highly doubt means 3.0.2 at this point in time. I'd change it to a patch version myself, but I don't know which patch brought that change, so can someone take care of it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sariko (talk · contr).
Split?
It's been suggested this page be split to have 3 lore pages, one for each bug.
There's nothing to split, if you wish to make what is currently redirects to this article go ahead. I'm going to remove the split request soonish. 
(Sssss/Slithered) 01:54, December 25, 2009 (UTC)
- To be fair, every single other multi-boss fight has articles for each boss involved, even when there's little reason to do so (see Twin Val'kyr, Twin Emperors, Eredar Twins, etc.) -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 02:03, December 25, 2009 (UTC)
- Again, look at the Twin Val'kyr. They each have individual pages, both of which contain absolutely nothing besides a one-sentence description, an infobox, and a link to the fight page. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:26, December 25, 2009 (UTC)
- Please understand what I'm saying... if someone wants to create the pages (even if one line and a link to the fight) that's fine. What I'm saying is there's nothing to split from the this article and it was not correct to place a split stub here.
(Sssss/Slithered) 00:12, December 26, 2009 (UTC)
- Aaaaaaaah. I did misunderstand what you were saying. Sorry 'bout that. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 00:36, December 26, 2009 (UTC)
- Please understand what I'm saying... if someone wants to create the pages (even if one line and a link to the fight) that's fine. What I'm saying is there's nothing to split from the this article and it was not correct to place a split stub here.
Move to Silithid Royalty?
The raidinfo UI calls this encounter Silithid Royalty. Since I think this is the first official name we've gotten for the encounter (and it sounds worlds better than "Three Bugs"), should we move it there? -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- If that's the case, then I don't have any objections to move it. --g0urra[T҂C] 21:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- ...Looks like Kirkburn sysop protected four years ago and never lifted it, so I can't move it myself. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- By the way, can we confirm with the RaidUI bosses with speculative name? ACidmaw, the Val'kyr, the blood princes, and other?
- Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 21:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for the long delay, but here we go: Northrend Beasts, Val'kyr Twins, and Blood Council. Any others you're curious about? -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 19:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
