This category is not only a misnomer (gems are not bind on equip) but is probably unneeded; the vast majority of gems are not BoP, and I see no reason to have a category for those that aren't. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 18:51, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

By counts, BoP gems account for 20% of the total number of gems. I would hesitate to call 80% "vast". Besides, relative quantity is not a good argument. A better argument, IMO, would be "is this category useful?" As is, it serves as foil for the BoP gems category: any gem belongs in one or the other category. Useful for symmetry (thus maybe to automation). --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 18:10, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.