Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
Register
No edit summary
(27 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
I'd like to be on this team. --[[User:Xmuskrat|Xmuskrat]] 16:34, 12 February 2007 (EST)
= NP Patrol {{discussiontab}} page =
 
Leave any questions or comments you have about the NP Patrol here...
 
   
  +
: Please count me in too {{User:Sharlin/Sig}} 15:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
== What does patrolled mean? ==
 
When we mark a page as 'patrolled', what does that do? --[[User:Sting-Ray ZA|Sting-Ray ZA]] 01:41, 5 June 2006 (EDT)
 
:Nevermind - I think I answered my own question :P It seems to change the color of that page on the 'New Pages' page --[[User:Sting-Ray ZA|Sting-Ray ZA]] 01:54, 5 June 2006 (EDT)
 
:: It removes the <font color="red">'''!'''</font> in [[Special:Recentchanges]]. It seems like you only get the [ Mark as patrolled ] link when you do a diff from the Recent changes page.
 
:: Marking as patrolled doesn't clear the annoying yellow from New pages list, it looks like when a new page is edited (changes after new page), the yellow clears. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 4:06 PM PDT 9 Jun 2006
 
   
  +
==Members==
::: Erhm, clicking the [Mark this page as patrolled] in the bottom right hand corner unmarks it in the New pages list. Pages stay "New" no matter the amount of edits until they've been marked as patrolled. --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] 07:36, 23 June 2006 (EDT)
 
  +
Just to be more specific, are members of the older community teams [[WoWWiki:NP Patrol|NP Patrol]] and [[WoWWiki:RC Patrol|RC Patrol]] not automatically members of this? Reapplications are needed? [[User:Sam Weber|Sam Weber]] 17:23, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
   
  +
: Late answer, but automatic, yes :) {{User:Kirkburn/Sig4}} 10:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
:::: Are you sure? My brief observation of the behavior of [[Special:Newpages]] is that they unmark far more often than pages get marked patrolled, but I could be wrong. I generally only patrol some of the edits in the WoWWiki: namespace... I wonder who is patrolling other stuff? --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 8:43 PM PDT 24 Jun 2006
 
   
  +
== Bow wow wow? ==
::::: Well, I'm sure insofar as this is how it worked when I went and tested it on a couple of pages. I'd edited one of my pages about half a dozen times, and it was still showing up marked here. Then I clicked [Mark this page as patrolled] in the bottom right corner, and it unmarked. Can't say I've gone and actually dug around in the MediaWiki code on the matter though :-) &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] 06:13, 25 June 2006 (EDT)
 
   
  +
Anyones feels like making a cute picture for this user team? Like, with a chained WoW dog/wolf and his 'house' (dunno how to call what Snoopy sleeps on ><).--[[User:Kirochi|<span style="border-bottom:2px; cursor:help" title="Kirochi is a WoWWiki Bookkeeper and AMA member"><font color="green">'''K'''</font> <font color="red">''')'''</font></span>]] <small>([[User talk:Kirochi|talk]])</small> 19:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
== Horrible new pages yellow! ==
 
Is there any way we can get the [[Special:Newpages|New Pages]] page to look/work like the [[Special:Recentchanges|Recent Changes]] page? The red ! is much friendlier than the stark yellowy-whitey color... --[[User:Sting-Ray ZA|Sting-Ray ZA]] 07:18, 7 June 2006 (EDT)
 
:I think [[User:Rustak|Rustak]] can change it (by a stylesheet or something) so it is a different color. I may bug him soon about it. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 3:55 PM PDT 9 Jun 2006
 
:: I've mailed a new stylesheet to Rustak with various little fixes. Among other things, the horrible horrible yellow background is history. --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] 17:55, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
 
:: Tadaa! Readable! Except I see now that a listing style that I changed bled through to that page also, which I didn't intend. Imo it gets a little cramped now with the smaller font. I'd fix it, except I can't, easily >.< &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] 14:55, 20 June 2006 (EDT)
 
::: I love it! Thanks [[User:Mikk|Mikk]]! --[[User:Sting-Ray ZA|Sting-Ray ZA]] 05:09, 23 June 2006 (EDT)
 
:::: WoW, I'm so clueless. Thanks Mikk. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 8:45 PM PDT 24 Jun 2006
 
   
  +
That would be a Dog House :) [[User:Gadgetfingers|Gadgetfingers]]
== Heads up: New guild page policy ==
 
   
  +
:Maybe [[Spot]]'s pic? -- [[User:Harveydrone|Harveydrone]] ( [[User_talk:Harveydrone|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Harveydrone|work]] ) 22:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Just a quick heads-up for you guys. There's a new [[WoWWiki:Policy/Writing/Guild pages|guild page policy]] in effect as of today. Among other things, (near) blank guild pages are ''required'' to be tagged with {{tlink|Stub/Guild}}. If you guys could help out with that, that'd be dandy :-) &nbsp; Thanks! &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] 17:57, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
 
   
  +
Looks good to me. [[User:Gadgetfingers|gadget]] 02:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
== Inappropriate content in New pages ==
 
*See [[Doomhammer Boodah]]. Mark as SpeedyDelete? --[[User:Dracomage|Dracomage]] 07:27, 20 June 2006 (EDT)
 
:*That's personal defamation and should be speedydeleted. Might want to issue a warning somehow. Dunno how that works. Someone else will. --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] 10:54, 20 June 2006 (EDT)
 
*[[Bad Cow Puns]] what to do with this? --[[User:Dracomage|Dracomage]] 07:41, 20 June 2006 (EDT)
 
:*Lol. Category:Silly? =) --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] 10:54, 20 June 2006 (EDT)
 
*[[Natathel]] -- Marking as SpeedyDelete... --[[User:Sting-Ray ZA|Sting-Ray ZA]] 05:44, 23 June 2006 (EDT)
 
   
  +
: Added :) {{User:Kirkburn/Sig4}} 10:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
*[[Less Stupid Rumored Races]] Um... I think this was a stub thrown off by energetic debate at [[Talk:Rumored_Races]], but now it's kind of a weak page to leave out there. I'm a new user myself and not sure what to do. Flag it? Vote for deletion? Merge? Redirect? [[User:Luci|Luci]] 16:44, 28 June 2006 (EDT)
 
: My gut feel would be to just move the content to a new section in Talk:Rumored_Races and make the "Less..." a redirect to there. If the author objects, he can always revert. (Make a note in Talk:.. that you copied the content from the original page) --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] 19:52, 28 June 2006 (EDT)
 
:: Done. Thanks. Learning more every day. [[User:Luci|Luci]] 06:56, 29 June 2006 (EDT)
 
   
== Empty New pages ==
+
== Patrol ==
  +
Is it possible to flag all of a user's recent edits as patroled? Example would be Pratt, who is merely changing categories but they are all marked as not patroled. {{User:Sharlin/Sig}} 16:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
What to do? Spotted a user go on a rampage creating zero-content pages (other than name, stub and cats). Please see [[User:Rascilon]] contributions (look at the new pages). Advice? --[[User:Dracomage|Dracomage]] 13:47, 16 August 2006 (EDT)
 
   
  +
:Yes. It's in (Pratt's) [[Special:Preferences]], under editing I believe. --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] · [http://www.wowhead.com/?user=Skyfire w]) 03:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
: Wanted to ask the same question - these are obviously bots creating those pages just out of some weird WoW addon. They could at least provide location info etc. thats available ingame. Also I think Bots should be marked as those and get a separate user like its common procedure in wikipedia (Mikk's bot too, though he marks botted edits and keeps them low.) . Also creating new pages and stubbing them for others to provide the actual content is somehow useless. New pages with stubs should only created with the intent to enhance them in the near future, and bots don't intend anything. -[[User:Watchout|watchout]] 04:42, 19 September 2006 (EDT)
 
   
  +
A riff on that theme: Is it possible to view "all of user X's recent edits" with the indicator for patrolled/not patrolled? --[[User:Eirik Ratcatcher|Eirik Ratcatcher]] ([[User talk:Eirik Ratcatcher|talk]]) 20:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
::We talked to [[User:Rascilon|Rascilon]] and he wasn't using a bot as far as can be determined (you could ask him directly). In theory, any [[bot]]s should be part of the [[Special:Listusers|Bots user group]] (select Bots from Group menu and click Go) for them to be effective. Currently we only have [[User:Mikkbot]] in that group. --{{adminsig|Fandyllic}} 11:07 AM PDT 19 Sep 2006
 
{{Comment}}
 
::: Sorry my fault, I didnt mean Rascilon - I meant in general, one of those being [[User:Umbra|Umbra]]. [[Master Sergeant's Insignia]] - this page was created a week ago, more than 100 new (almost empty) item pages go between, there was obviously no intent to extend it or even clarify the external links. This pages have absolutely no value in my opinion.
 
::: Ok, maybe they are no bots but users. Creating hundreds of almost empty pages and then stubbing them. where's the reason? -[[User:Watchout|watchout]] 02:47, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 
   
  +
== WW:RC working again ==
:::: Hm. Just creating ''completely'' empty pages and stubbing them is one thing. But those external links are actually useful - at least, in my opinion. - My {{c|.02}} &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|<span style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; cursor: help;" title="Mikk is a WoWWiki Admin">Mikk</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 05:04, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 
   
 
After being offline for ~3 months, [[WW:RC]] is working again. Do let me know if there's some phrase you'd like the script to look for in addition to the ones it already is. (On my talk page please, I don't monitor this page.) --[[User:Mikk|<span style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; cursor: help;" title="Mikk is a WoWWiki Admin">Mikk</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 05:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
::::: Come on, this is a wiki and not an item database, thott, allakhazam, goblinworkshop and all those have a much greater database and are due to their nature alone more accurate, have better search utilities and whatnot... -[[User:Watchout|watchout]] 06:50, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
:::::: Making empty stubbed pages I am mostly against ... however, I'm not tooo worried about pages which are mostly an external link - ''as long as that page is linked from elsewhere in the wiki'', such as from a instance loot table page as such pages are more likely to be visited and have their info added at some stage. I say this because the fewer giant lists of external links we have, the better. But pages that aren't referenced from anywhere else on the wiki and are tiny do seem a little pointless. -- [[User:Kirkburn|<span style="border-bottom:1px dotted; cursor:help;" title="Kirkburn is a WoWWiki Admin">Kirkburn</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Kirkburn|talk]])</small> 09:29, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
::::::: Kirkburn's "linked vs not linked" argument is very valid imo. I wonder what the case is with these only-external-link pages... &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|<span style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; cursor: help;" title="Mikk is a WoWWiki Admin">Mikk</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 11:22, 20 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
:::::: I think we should talk about cases like [[Master Sergeant's Insignia]] though, since it has multiple external links to the same DB site (3 sets of external links to Thottbot, Allakhazam and Wowhead). This is confusing in the very least and some effort should be made to distinguish multiple links to the same sites. This isn't really a NP Patrol issue, but probably more of a Commentators issue. I will try to summarize this issue and place it at [[WoWWiki:Requests for comment]]. --[[User:Fandyllic|<span style="border-bottom:1px dotted; cursor:help;" title="Fandyllic is a WoWWiki Admin">Fandyllic</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Fandyllic|talk]])</small> 5:06 PM PDT 20 Sep 2006
 
 
==No Content Pages==
 
 
While I don't appreciate my contributions being considered a 'rampage', I believe I was operating in accordance to the stub policy. If this is not correct, please let me know and revise this policy page. [http://www.wowwiki.com/WoWWiki:Find_or_fix_a_stub Stub Policy]
 
 
"Throughout WoWWiki are articles with little or '''no content''' that have been created with the intention of filling them in. These are refered to as stubs and are tagged specifically to tell visitors that they are, in fact, stubs, and to make it easier for other contributors to find them."
 
 
--[[User:Rascilon|Rascilon]] 1:50, 16, August 2006 (PST)
 
 
::Yup, Rascilon has it right. I can see why there was initial concern, but I think it is eventually all for the good. Unstubbed new pages with no content are really what we should worry about. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 12:23 PM PDT 17 Aug 2006
 
 
::: Very good. Thank you for the feedback. --[[User:Dracomage|Dracomage]] 14:44, 17 August 2006 (EDT)
 
 
==New Pages not showing up as Un-patrolled?==
 
Since the weekend None of the new pages added is showing up as "not patrolled"?? Any ideas? --[[User:Dracomage|Dracomage]] 11:30, 6 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
: ? They're showing up in [[Special:Newpages]] just fine for me, and nicely marked with red squares. &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 11:43, 6 September 2006 (EDT)
 
:: Checked again. Nothing for me - they all appear "patrolled". Have I been RIF-ed from the NP Patrol? :P --[[User:Dracomage|Dracomage]] 13:18, 6 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
::: Hrm. Could be a browser bug I suppose. What are you running? I've tested with Firefox 1.5, Opera 8, Opera 9 and IE 6. IE 6 "sort of " works. I need to mouse over the links before the colorization takes effect. No surprise there :-( &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 14:28, 6 September 2006 (EDT)
 
::: Firefox 1.5. Even if I visit any of the new pages, they do not have the "click here to mark as patrolled"? I'm very confused. --[[User:Dracomage|Dracomage]] 15:23, 6 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
:::: Ahhh. That sounds like the Squid web accelerator playing games. Try hitting shift+reload on the page. &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 16:04, 6 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
::::: Mikk are you talking about whether articles are "visited" or patrolled? There is a red bar that should change color or disappear if a new page has been patrolled, but the pages don't seem to show their patrolled status in [[Special:Newpages]]. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 4:01 PM PDT 6 Sep 2006
 
 
:::::: Ehm, both. I thought it was the red bars first, but then Dracomage talked about the "mark as patrolled"..
 
:::::: But now you're saying it's the red bars that are missing - for you also?
 
:::::: Have you tried shift+reload in [[Special:Newpages]]?
 
:::::: Both work for me. I get a red mark in [[Special:Newpages]], and I get the "mark as patrolled" link in the pages. &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 20:28, 6 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
::::::: Okay, I can get the "mark as patrolled" link, but the red bar seems to still be on new pages that have had at least one edit after creation in [[Special:Newpages]], but only in some cases. I'm wondering if there is some flag on a user that make them a valid "patroller" so the red bar goes away?
 
::::::: I only had a vague notion of how [[Special:Newpages]] worked before, but now I have no idea. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 7:09 PM PDT 6 Sep 2006
 
 
Okay.. I've tested with a non-admin user. There are no red blocks in [[Special:Newpages]], and there are no "[mark as patrolled"] links in new pages. Looking at pages linked from [[Special:Recentchanges]], there's no "[mark as patrolled]" in the diff header.
 
 
There has to be something new that you need to configure for RC/NP patrol users, that Admins have enabled by default. Time to go digging? (I assume Fandyllic is the one that has to do this; fiddling user rights tends to require Bureaucrat admin status.)
 
 
&nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 22:41, 6 September 2006 (EDT)
 
:Thanks Mikk. Hope Mr F and Mr R can get to the bottom of this. --[[User:Dracomage|Dracomage]] 23:13, 6 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
::As a [[bureaucrat]], I appear to only have the ability to assign users to groups, not fiddle with the rights of any groups. Sorry... :-( --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] 10:32 PM PDT 7 Sep 2006
 
 
::: This has now been fixed. Rustak set up a "patrollers" user group with permission to do RC/NP patrolling. Fandyllic has made all of the RC/NP teams members of this user group.
 
::: We also had the option of going back to the way it was before - where all users were able to patrol edits, but this seemed the better choice - this way, vandals can't mark their work patrolled themselves.
 
::: &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|Mikk]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 21:47, 10 September 2006 (EDT)
 
::::Yeah! Back to working!--[[User:Dracomage|Dracomage]] 10:35, 11 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
== Guild Stubs ==
 
 
I created a little bot script to help with the guild-stub issue...
 
<strike>[[User:Watchoutbot/GuildStubAge]]</strike> [[WoWWiki:Guild stubs]] - I see if I can do a little cronjob and run the bot every day if you like so -[[User:Watchout|watchout]] 07:21, 22 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
: Nice one! Add it to [[:Category:Things to do]]. &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|<span style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; cursor: help;" title="Mikk is a WoWWiki Admin">Mikk</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 09:13, 22 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
:: I'm still a bit busy with the script, but I got the bot to submit the content itself and added the category. Maybe I will do the same for [[:Category:Stubs/Player|Stubs/Player]].
 
:: Oh and... We don't have something like http://en.wikipedia.org/w/query.php by chance? *cough* -[[User:Watchout|watchout]] 12:02, 22 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
::: Mmmm I'd like that one, too. My suggestion would be to go dig the script up and mail it to Rustak and say "pweetty pweeaaase" :-) &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|<span style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; cursor: help;" title="Mikk is a WoWWiki Admin">Mikk</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 12:57, 22 September 2006 (EDT)
 
:::: The query API can be found here [[Wikipedia:User:Yurik/Query_API]], though I'm not sure how secure this thing is despite the fact that it's running on the en.wikipedia. So I want to check it out before I recommend this thing to anyone ;) -[[User:Watchout|watchout]] 17:47, 22 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
::: Oh, two more things: poke Fandyllic about bot flagging your bot account, and ..hmm.. maybe we can think of a better name for that page... Or perhaps you should replace the category tag with a &lt;noinclude>{{tlink|nocat}}&lt;/noinlcude> and we include it into something in the WoWWiki namespace where we can edit categorization and descriptions at will. Hm, yeah, that strikes me as a better idea, actually. &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|<span style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; cursor: help;" title="Mikk is a WoWWiki Admin">Mikk</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 13:00, 22 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
:::: No please, actually I put it on my bot's userpages because I didnt know how good my script was and what side effects happen. Some things you can only test on the running environment, and I was not sure how good my idea was - and... I know no better name, but there somewhere in the twisting nether, there must be one!
 
:::: Using an other page is a matter of changing one string so no real need for inclusion, but shouldnt it be <nowiki><includeonly></nowiki> instead of <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> ? Ah no, now I get it, ok yes good idea - so we need a page name and I can reduce the bot to only post the list and point it to ''pagename''/data or whatever. right?
 
 
::::: Precisely! How about simply [[WoWWiki:Guild stubs/List]]? &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|<span style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; cursor: help;" title="Mikk is a WoWWiki Admin">Mikk</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 18:10, 22 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
:::::: and that's the place where it lives now. thanks for the creative help -[[User:Watchout|watchout]] 05:26, 23 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
:::: Oh, and if you like some more info from the bot, just tell me. Currently I'm parsing the normal article page, but I'd like to parse the history page in the future and get author's names etc. maybe even find out when the article was stubbed.
 
:::: About the bot usergroup, I thought you can botflag the user, but no problem I will /poke fandyllic until he gives up and /slap's back -[[User:Watchout|watchout]] 17:47, 22 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
::::: Nope, only admins with [[Special:Listusers/Bureaucrat]] powers can do that. &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|<span style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; cursor: help;" title="Mikk is a WoWWiki Admin">Mikk</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 18:09, 22 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
:::::: Okay, [[User:Watchoutbot|Watchoutbot]] has been ''bot-ified''. --[[User:Fandyllic|<span style="border-bottom:1px dotted; cursor:help;" title="Fandyllic is a WoWWiki Admin">Fandyllic</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Fandyllic|talk]])</small> 3:16 PM PDT 22 Sep 2006
 
 
::::::: Ah, you could've held the branding-iron a bit longer on his digital skin, those deserve no better! thanks anyway - the bot has a userpage btw. but I see I have to clarify some things there too -[[User:Watchout|watchout]] 05:26, 23 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
: FYI: Sometimes pages are shown with incorrect last edit dates. this actually is ''not'' a bug in my script, but seemingly wikipedia ignoring "small" edits when fetching the last edit date. (It does'nt seem to matter if you do a "minor edit" or not.)
 
: So I want to say again. Please don't trust the script without viewing the site yourself. The script's main purpose is finding "abandoned" stub pages, because authors who edit their pages normally strip the stub-tag pretty soon on their own anyway -[[User:Watchout|watchout]] 23:55, 24 September 2006 (EDT)
 
 
==Player information in another language?==
 
What to do with player information that's not in English, like I just found [[User:Lunar_org]]? It's quite private information, anyway, but it's still an English wiki.. Any ideas? --[[User:Tinkerer|Tinkerer]] 07:17, 1 October 2006 (EDT)
 
 
: Until it becomes a real problem? Nothing imo. It's a page in "User:" space, where we really haven't done anything previously. &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|<span style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; cursor: help;" title="Mikk is a WoWWiki Admin">Mikk</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 07:25, 1 October 2006 (EDT)
 
 
:: You could suggest the [http://www.wow-wiki.net/ German wow-wiki.net]. --[[User:Fandyllic|<span style="border-bottom:1px dotted; cursor:help;" title="Fandyllic is a WoWWiki Admin">Fandyllic</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Fandyllic|talk]])</small> 5:46 PM PDT 1 Oct 2006
 
 
: Well it's a Userpage, so in my opinion it's ok since users are responsible for "their" userpages. The best way imho would be leaving him a note on the talk page, telling that this is an english wiki, and even userpages are visible to the common and should be written in english as a sign of good manner etc... -[[User:Watchout|watchout]] 09:07, 2 October 2006 (EDT)
 
 
::: Alright, thanks for the help. I just started, so I'm a bit of a newbie :) I left a note on his page. EDIT: Ah, Mikk was faster. --[[User:Tinkerer|Tinkerer]] 15:26, 2 October 2006 (EDT)
 
 
:::: Gotta wake up earlier in the morning to beat me :-P &nbsp; --[[User:Mikk|<span style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; cursor: help;" title="Mikk is a WoWWiki Admin">Mikk</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mikk|T]])</small> 15:43, 2 October 2006 (EDT)
 
 
::::: /sob --[[User:Tinkerer|Tinkerer]] 15:44, 2 October 2006 (EDT)
 
 
==Resigning from NP Patrol==
 
I am sorry but I feel the need to resign from the NP Patrol. The new boilerplate design/tooltip pages is increasing the new page generation by a factor of 10. Too much. I cannot continue to assist as I did prior to the redesign on the item pages. --[[User:Dracomage|Dracomage]] 11:58, 27 November 2006 (EST)
 
 
:There is no 'new' boilerplate design. As far as I know, [[Boilerplate:Item]] is still the recommended boilerplate. The crazy multi-page boilerplate seems to be something [[User:Tekkub|Tekkub]] thought up, so you might want to talk to him about how it makes new page review overwhelming. My general plan is to let him do it for those items he wants to add, but I wouldn't recommend it.
 
:In the mean time, I'll honor your wish to be removed from NP Patrol, but if you change your mind, just add yourself back. --[[User:Fandyllic|<span style="border-bottom:1px dotted; cursor:help;" title="Fandyllic is a WoWWiki Admin">Fandyllic</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Fandyllic|talk]])</small> 11:06 AM PST 27 Nov 2006
 

Revision as of 20:13, 25 June 2009

I'd like to be on this team. --Xmuskrat 16:34, 12 February 2007 (EST)

Please count me in too User:Sharlin/Sig 15:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Members

Just to be more specific, are members of the older community teams NP Patrol and RC Patrol not automatically members of this? Reapplications are needed? Sam Weber 17:23, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

Late answer, but automatic, yes :) Kirkburn  talk  contr 10:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Bow wow wow?

Anyones feels like making a cute picture for this user team? Like, with a chained WoW dog/wolf and his 'house' (dunno how to call what Snoopy sleeps on ><).--K ) (talk) 19:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

That would be a Dog House :) Gadgetfingers

Maybe Spot's pic? -- Harveydrone ( talk | work ) 22:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Looks good to me. gadget 02:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Added :) Kirkburn  talk  contr 10:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Patrol

Is it possible to flag all of a user's recent edits as patroled? Example would be Pratt, who is merely changing categories but they are all marked as not patroled. User:Sharlin/Sig 16:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes. It's in (Pratt's) Special:Preferences, under editing I believe. --Sky (t · c · w) 03:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

A riff on that theme: Is it possible to view "all of user X's recent edits" with the indicator for patrolled/not patrolled? --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 20:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

WW:RC working again

After being offline for ~3 months, WW:RC is working again. Do let me know if there's some phrase you'd like the script to look for in addition to the ones it already is. (On my talk page please, I don't monitor this page.) --Mikk (T) 05:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)