No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Forumheader|Wowpedia general}} |
||
− | {{stub/Cataclysm}} |
||
+ | <!-- Please put your content under this paragraph. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> |
||
− | <onlyinclude>{{{{{tpl|tooltip}}} |
||
− | |mode={{{mode|}}} |
||
− | |arg={{{arg|}}} |
||
− | |name=Ring of the Quenched Inferno |
||
− | |quality=Uncommon |
||
− | |icon=inv jewelry ring 04 |
||
− | |itemid=57331 |
||
− | |bind=BoP |
||
− | |slot=Finger |
||
− | |attrib=+85 Agility<br/>+127 Stamina |
||
− | |ilvl=272 |
||
− | |effect=Equip: Improves critical strike rating by 57.<br/>Equip: Increases your mastery rating by 55. |
||
− | |sell={{cost|5|96|83}} |
||
− | }}</onlyinclude> |
||
+ | Tell me that is add bar is a joke please. |
||
− | '''Ring of the Quenched Inferno''' is a quest reward from {{quest|Disrupting the Rituals}}. |
||
+ | {{User:A'noob/sig}} 21:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
− | ==Patch changes== |
||
− | {{Patch 4.0.3|note=Added}} |
||
+ | :Yeah. I noticed it a few minutes ago. There is one at the top and bottom of every page. We all knew this would happen eventually (though I read there would only be the one).--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 22:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
− | ==External links== |
||
− | <!-- Read http://www.wowpedia.org/Wowpedia:External_links before posting your links here. |
||
− | Links that do not conform to the rules will be DELETED. |
||
− | Repeat violations may result in a BAN. |
||
− | Have a nice day. :) --> |
||
− | {{elinks-item|57331}} |
||
+ | ::The Most Silly Thing (for me) is that the ad bars aren't set to the page width. Of course, I browse in "mostly ad-free" mode... --[[User:Eirik Ratcatcher|Eirik Ratcatcher]] ([[User talk:Eirik Ratcatcher|talk]]) 22:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
− | [[Category:World of Warcraft uncommon quest rewards]] |
||
+ | |||
− | [[Category:World of Warcraft finger items]] |
||
+ | :::I was aware this would happen too, but the top one is simply aggravating, standing between the article name and the article is not a very good place for a AD to be--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 22:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | :i Would only offer 2 suggestions |
||
+ | ::Change the Top bar to somewhere more comfortable(interpret that as you will) |
||
+ | ::Give at least some space between the category and the bottom bag, they are glued together and makes it hard to read--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 22:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | :::I'd kind of prefer they just not appear on talk or user/user talk pages. {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 22:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ::::I guess there's noone to address these problems we have or is there?--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 22:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
+ | :::::We'll try to raise someone on this. --{{User:Pcj/sig}} 22:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:57, 7 February 2011
Forums: Village pump → New Ad Bar
Tell me that is add bar is a joke please.
Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 21:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah. I noticed it a few minutes ago. There is one at the top and bottom of every page. We all knew this would happen eventually (though I read there would only be the one).--SWM2448 22:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- The Most Silly Thing (for me) is that the ad bars aren't set to the page width. Of course, I browse in "mostly ad-free" mode... --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 22:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- I was aware this would happen too, but the top one is simply aggravating, standing between the article name and the article is not a very good place for a AD to be--Ashbear160 (talk) 22:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- i Would only offer 2 suggestions
- Change the Top bar to somewhere more comfortable(interpret that as you will)
- Give at least some space between the category and the bottom bag, they are glued together and makes it hard to read--Ashbear160 (talk) 22:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- I guess there's noone to address these problems we have or is there?--Ashbear160 (talk) 22:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)