Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
(Crusader Strike Stub)
m (โ†’โ€ŽWant to participate? Vote!: clean up, replaced: WoWWiki:Policy/Voting โ†’ WoWWiki:Voting policy)
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
   
 
=== Want to participate? Vote! ===
 
=== Want to participate? Vote! ===
โˆ’
WoWWiki isn't an absolute democracy, but many decisions are [[WoWWiki:Policy/Voting|voted on]]. Also, we encourage members to [[WoWWiki:Policy_status_phases|vote]] on site [[WoWWiki:Policies|policies]]. See a [[:Category:Votes_in_progress|list of votes in progress]] or a [[:Category:Policy_proposals|list of policy proposals]]. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] <small>([[User talk:Fandyllic|talk]])</small> 4:56 PM PDT 25 Jul 2006
+
WoWWiki isn't an absolute democracy, but many decisions are [[WoWWiki:Voting policy|voted on]]. Also, we encourage members to [[WoWWiki:Policy_status_phases|vote]] on site [[WoWWiki:Policies|policies]]. See a [[:Category:Votes_in_progress|list of votes in progress]] or a [[:Category:Policy_proposals|list of policy proposals]]. --[[User:Fandyllic|Fandyllic]] <small>([[User talk:Fandyllic|talk]])</small> 4:56 PM PDT 25 Jul 2006
   
 
== Please do not revert without good cause. ==
 
== Please do not revert without good cause. ==
Line 18: Line 18:
 
== Crusader Strike Stub ==
 
== Crusader Strike Stub ==
   
โˆ’
I've reverted the motion to delete the article, [[Crusader Strike]]. There's nothing written about Crusader Strike, yet, but its a new Paladin talent released in 2.0. That alone makes it qualify for a worth article, whether or not we have anything to say about it now. We can even categorize it accordingly while we wait. Also, we aren't Wikipedia.--<span style="font-size: 0.85em; padding: .2em .3em; border-top: 1px #504c50 solid; border-bottom: 1px #504c50 solid; background-color: #2C2C2C">'''[[User:Hobinheim|<span style="cursor:help;color:#62fc00">Hobinheim</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Hobinheim|<span style="color:#aaff00">talk</span>]] ยท [[Special:Contributions/Hobinheim|<span style="color:#ffff00">contr</span>]])</small></span> 10:37, 21 January 2007 (EST)
+
I've reverted the motion to delete the article, [[Crusader Strike]]. There's nothing written about Crusader Strike, yet, but its a new Paladin talent released in 2.0. That alone makes it qualify for a worthy article, whether or not we have anything to say about it now. We can even categorize it accordingly while we wait. Also, we aren't Wikipedia.--<span style="font-size: 0.85em; padding: .2em .3em; border-top: 1px #504c50 solid; border-bottom: 1px #504c50 solid; background-color: #2C2C2C">'''[[User:Hobinheim|<span style="cursor:help;color:#62fc00">Hobinheim</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Hobinheim|<span style="color:#aaff00">talk</span>]] ยท [[Special:Contributions/Hobinheim|<span style="color:#ffff00">contr</span>]])</small></span> 10:37, 21 January 2007 (EST)
  +
  +
== Terestian Illhoof changes. ==
  +
  +
I note you changed the note about using druids to pick up the Imp. The reason druids are used is they can morph between forms, allowing them to bear tank the imp and cat DPS while the imp is down.
  +
  +
Do you think I should expound on the point in the article, or simply leave it generic as you changed it? [[User:Stillfresh|Stillfresh]] 15:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:17, 1 June 2010

Welcome

Welcome to WoWWiki!
As you already have, we hope you can continue to help the community and vice versa :-)
If you have any questions, someone will gladly answer them, or you could drop them at the reference desk.
We just wanted to say welcome, and to encourage you to continue contributing! --Fandyllic (talk)

Want to help more? Join a team!

As a community it is easier to get large amounts of maintenance and community projects done in teams - we like to encourage each wiki-user (also known as WoWWikians) to join one or two. Check out Community teams for more info! --Fandyllic (talk)

Want to participate? Vote!

WoWWiki isn't an absolute democracy, but many decisions are voted on. Also, we encourage members to vote on site policies. See a list of votes in progress or a list of policy proposals. --Fandyllic (talk) 4:56 PM PDT 25 Jul 2006

Please do not revert without good cause.

I can see that you've brought with you the spirit of smug "I know better than you" intellectualism from Wikipedia, but please try to at least remember that you still have to answer for your reverts, and just a simple adding of "Revert" in the description won't do it. Vaschellie 11:16, 26 September 2006 (EDT)

I apologize, but that sounded like vandalism to me. I mean, SS is the only reason Rogues can't use 2-handers? Please. I didn't think it warranted a detailed description of why it was revert-worthy. In the future, however, I'll add more detailed explanations, if it's necessary. Meanwhile, I won't re-re-revert that and leave the graffiti for you to remove. :) RobertM525 00:29, 27 September 2006 (EDT)

Crusader Strike Stub

I've reverted the motion to delete the article, Spell holy crusaderstrike [Crusader Strike]. There's nothing written about Crusader Strike, yet, but its a new Paladin talent released in 2.0. That alone makes it qualify for a worthy article, whether or not we have anything to say about it now. We can even categorize it accordingly while we wait. Also, we aren't Wikipedia.--Hobinheim (talk ยท contr) 10:37, 21 January 2007 (EST)

Terestian Illhoof changes.

I note you changed the note about using druids to pick up the Imp. The reason druids are used is they can morph between forms, allowing them to bear tank the imp and cat DPS while the imp is down.

Do you think I should expound on the point in the article, or simply leave it generic as you changed it? Stillfresh 15:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)