Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
(→‎Horde and blood elf discussion: Moved comments from Talk: Blood knight.)
No edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:
 
If you'd like to discuss this topic further, you may do so here, as your talk page is pretty much your own territory unless it gets particularly ugly. However, overstated claims regarding the evil nature of the blood elves or further discussion based solely on your opinion regarding them will be removed from talk pages. Please keep that discussion here. {{User:Montag/sig}} 23:19, 13 February 2007 (EST)
 
If you'd like to discuss this topic further, you may do so here, as your talk page is pretty much your own territory unless it gets particularly ugly. However, overstated claims regarding the evil nature of the blood elves or further discussion based solely on your opinion regarding them will be removed from talk pages. Please keep that discussion here. {{User:Montag/sig}} 23:19, 13 February 2007 (EST)
   
Can anyone explain why Thrall has let in(and is even pleased by) evil mockeries of a paladins who obtain through their power through evil(its pratically a class requirement to be evil). anyone a Valid reason this belongs in the controversy section.
+
Can anyone explain why Thrall has let in(and is even pleased by) evil mockeries of a paladins who obtain through their power through evil(its pratically a class requirement to be evil). Unless anyone can give a Valid reason this belongs in the controversy section.
 
[[User:Angry ogre|Angry ogre]] 17:45, 15 February 2007 (EST)
 
[[User:Angry ogre|Angry ogre]] 17:45, 15 February 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 00:14, 16 February 2007

Welcome to Wowpedia!

Hello, {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}, and welcome to Wowpedia, the Warcraft wiki! Thank you for your contributions, and we heartily encourage you to continue contributing!

Some links you may find useful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wowpedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) as this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, or need help, just ask on the relevant talk page, or visit the site forums. Again, welcome! --~~~~

DnD Borrowing

I'm glad you agree with me about the heavy amounts of DnD borrowing in the Warcraft RPG which doesn't fit the Warcraft Universe at times. --- DarkTichondrias 19:22, 17 May 2006 (EDT)

Signatures

When you sign your statements use four tildes ~~~~ on the upper left of your keyboard. It automatically adds your user name. --- DarkTichondrias

If you're lazy like me, I've found three tildes ~~~ also works... ;-) --Fandyllic 11:04 AM PDT 19 May 2006

thanks

Angry ogre

Despite Fandy's comments, please use four tildes (~~~~), so that we can track comment times. Thank you. User:Kirkburn/Sig 01:46, 10 February 2007 (EST)


"controversy"

After discussion on the talk page, the descision was reached to remove the tragic flaw line, as is was proven incorrect. In future, please discuss your complaints before you edit. --Ragestorm 23:27, 9 November 2006 (EST)

Please see Talk:Draenei controversy.--Ragestorm (talk · contr) 22:29, 18 January 2007 (EST)

Brann is actually pretty neutral

Also I highly doubt authors are have alliance bias but more like earth human bias, LOL. The authors are human its alot easier to write from our own earth POV.

Plus if you actually read Brann's writing he is alot more neutral than any other alliance member, he's friends with trolls, orcs, whoever. He just dislikes certain individuals, when there is a good reason, and he's willing to cuss out the alliance if there is something wrong with them. He does it alot in his writing.Baggins 15:02, 1 January 2007 (EST)

Its pretty hard for a dwarf to tell you a completly unbiased view of the orcs,creatures who they have hard for conflict with for years. Dwarves live a long time,the events of the first and second war are probably still fresh in his mind. He will obviously support the alliance over the horde due to the fact that he is essentially a member of the alliance,the brother of the king of the dwarves infact. Think of it this way,would you want a forest troll telling the history of the high elves? Angry ogre

It's not really written by a dwarf, though, is it? Yes, the authors are pretending to write it as being Brann, but that doesn't preclude them from writing essentially neutrally - I don't believe the authors falsify important info in order to keep up the pretence it is dwarven written. User:Kirkburn/Sig 01:18, 22 January 2007 (EST)

"Biased propaganda"

Taking a look at your edits, it is obvious there is only one person biased about Drek'Thar, and it is you. You have removed citations, copied content from a website known for 'embellishing' details (and reads quite obviously as horde-biased), and continually engage in edit wars to get your point across. Have you read the RPG books? I should also mention a lack of reference to something in a novel is not the same as saying something didn't exist. Also, if you're going to complain about someone's edits ot reverts, at least have the courtesy to complain to the right person (i.e. not Baggins). User:Kirkburn/Sig 01:00, 22 January 2007 (EST)

Either way,the Dwarves have definetly not lived in Alterac valley,now Alterac mountains is another story. Angry ogre

How are you so definite on the first point (notwithstanding that you may be right)? User:Kirkburn/Sig 01:19, 22 January 2007 (EST)

Because if what was written was the true,the Alliance would have known of the Frostwolves a lot sooner,The Frostwolves probably would not have settled being too tired for a big conflict,and Lord of the clans makes no mention of Dwarves in alterac valley. Not to mention it makes no sense, how could Orcs invade their own valley? Angry ogre

Editing old comments

Please don't edit old comments - it ruins the flow and sense of a discussion. If you need to clarify something, do it in a follow-up post, please. If you substantially edit reasonably old comments again, I will have to revert it to preserve my sanity :) User:Kirkburn/Sig 18:05, 23 January 2007 (EST)

Rumored races

Don't attempt to slip in biased comments like that. It is not appreciated. User:Kirkburn/Sig 01:59, 25 January 2007 (EST)

M'uru

Recently, you've been good about keeping your opinions to the talk pages, so I'm giving you a warning on this: if you think the argument is flawed, discuss on the talk page to reach a consensus about how it should be addressed. I'm more than willing to entertain the idea that M'uru isn't a martyr, but only if it's done properly. --Ragestorm (talk · contr) 23:28, 6 February 2007 (EST)

Horde and blood elf discussion

If you'd like to discuss this topic further, you may do so here, as your talk page is pretty much your own territory unless it gets particularly ugly. However, overstated claims regarding the evil nature of the blood elves or further discussion based solely on your opinion regarding them will be removed from talk pages. Please keep that discussion here. User:Montag/sig 23:19, 13 February 2007 (EST)

Can anyone explain why Thrall has let in(and is even pleased by) evil mockeries of a paladins who obtain through their power through evil(its pratically a class requirement to be evil). Unless anyone can give a Valid reason this belongs in the controversy section. Angry ogre 17:45, 15 February 2007 (EST)