Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
Register
Advertisement

Large Footer[]

This footer is very sizeable. Can we crunch it up some? --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 22:43, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Only suggestion I can make... split the footer into PvP titles and PvE titles. SnakeSssssssssssssssssssssssss Coobra sig3For Pony! (Sssss/Slithered) 00:44, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
To reiterate, a year later, this template is way too effing big. A split is desperately needed. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 19:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
At this point, I'm tempted to just change it to something like this:
...or something similar to the above. --k_d3 01:13, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Just to contribute my opinion, I don't personally see that much of a problem. It would certainly be convenient if the template were smaller. However, it appears to be used only on title pages themselves (and title, ofc). Most of these pages are pretty bare (Zookeeper, Master of the Ways, Tamer), and the template provides a convenient overview and link to all the other titles. On those title pages that aren't incredibly minimal, the whole template's usually minimised by default anyway.
One possible compromise would be to set the template to auto-minimise; that way nobody needs to see it unless they actually want to see a big list of all the titles, in which case it's all there for them. Alternatively, if it were possible to set each section of the template (exploration, dungeons, etc) to auto-minimise, that would be a very neat solution.
I think it's pretty handy having all the titles laid out like that, although I do agree that the template is somewhat monstrous. If the template does get cut, I'd suggest transplanting the info into a table for title; it would serve very nicely as a kind of ToC for the page. -- Taohinton (talk) 20:35, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
I set the template to be collapsed by default. It's possible to make it so each section can be uncollapsed if called (like on {{Dungeons}}. --g0urra[T҂C] 08:04, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Advertisement