Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
Register
Advertisement

Scaling[]

I've done some testing with Spell fire incinerate [Immolation Aura] and Ability warlock avoidance [Shadow Cleave] to see how they scale. Here are the test results:

Level 67, target: Expert's Training Dummy

Immolation Aura
Spell power Tooltip damage per tick Actual damage per tick Estimated damage before Metamorphosis bonus Bonus damage from spell power SP coefficient per tick
0 331-332 397-398 331~332 0 -
365 331-332 460-461 383~384 ~52 ~14.25%
412 331-332 467-468 389~390 ~58 ~14.08%
457 331-332 475-476 396~397 ~65 ~14.22%
564 331-332 494-495 412~413 ~81 ~14.36%
609 331-332 502-503 418~419 ~87 ~14.29%
930 331-332 557-558 464~465 ~133 ~14.30%
Shadow Cleave
Spell power Tooltip damage Actual damage Estimated damage before Metamorphosis bonus Bonus damage from spell power SP coefficient
0 110 132 110.0 0 -
365 110 226 ~188.3 ~78.3 ~21.46%
412 110 238 ~198.3 ~88.3 ~21.44%
457 110 249 ~207.5 ~97.5 ~21.33%
564 110 277 ~230.8 ~120.8 ~21.42%
609 110 288 ~240.0 ~130.0 ~21.35%
930 110 371 ~309.2% ~119.2% ~21.42%

It seems that the coefficient for Immolation Aura in the spell power coefficient article includes the 20% damage bonus from Metamorphosis. Also, it seems that the base damage of Immolation Aura scales with level. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 03:08, September 30, 2009 (UTC)

Also, we could use more data on base damage for various levels. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 03:11, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
I've added some more data. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 04:15, September 30, 2009 (UTC)

Level-based scaling of Immolation Aura[]

Level Tooltip Damage Level Tooltip Damage Level Damage
60 - 70 - 80 -
61 - 71 - - -
62 - 72 - - -
63 - 73 - - -
64 - 74 - - -
65 - 75 - - -
66 - 76 - - -
67 331-332 77 - - -
68 343 78 - - -
69 354-355 79 - - -

I've created a table for base (tooltip) damage. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 03:02, October 15, 2009 (UTC)

What should be the right phrasing?[]

I changed it to "Removed. Now a demon hunter ability (Metamorphosis)." Are the brackets alright here? Or is there any better way to phrase this unique transition? After all, the two abilities are only linked conceptually.--Adûnâi (talk) 19:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm gonna go with "Removed due to the addition of the demon hunter class." -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 20:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement