Wowpedia

We have moved to Warcraft Wiki. Click here for information and the new URL.

READ MORE

Wowpedia
(bot; deploying #data/itemtip)
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
Who is ma'haat? And should we count Ozruk, Therazane called him one of his children.--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 01:27, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
{{#data:itemtip
 
|name=Astromancer's Crystal
 
|quality=common
 
|icon=inv_datacrystal05
 
|bind=Quest
 
|unique=1
 
|use=Samples the density of the nearest ley line field.
 
|itemid=34533
 
|flavor=The crystal pulses with a gentle vibration.}}
 
   
  +
:Ma'haat [http://www.wowhead.com/search?q=Ma%27haat+the+Indomitable exists]. Ozruk may be her child, but he is never called a stone lord, or even implied to be. He also looks very different.--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 01:37, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
==Source==
 
Provided for the quest {{questlong|neutral|70|Know Your Ley Lines}}.
 
   
  +
::I think she says that her children are the stone lords but i'm not sure.--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 01:57, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
==External links==
 
<!-- Read http://www.wowpedia.org/Wowpedia:External_links before posting your links here.
 
Links that do not conform to the rules will be DELETED.
 
Repeat violations may result in a BAN.
 
Have a nice day. :) -->
 
{{elinks-item|34533}}
 
   
  +
:::It sounds like he is a Stone Lord, but became so duty bound that he has lost sight of what hes actually doing... or became corrupted by the Twilight's Hammer. {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 02:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
[[Category:World of Warcraft common quest items]]
 
  +
  +
::::He may or may not be, but in trying to peg down a definition, the potential for a bunch of fallacies is there.--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 02:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
  +
  +
:::::Altrough it's a weak link when the stonemother says "Did I raise you to be fools?" it implies of the stone lords are her children.
  +
:::::And "One of my children is not with me, <name>." "I sent my other children" implies further but it's still pretty dubious.--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 03:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
  +
  +
:::::The Stone Lords are her children. Their reputation tab says that. However, not all of her children (even major ones) may be Stone Lords.--{{User:Sandwichman2448/Sig}} 03:09, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
  +
  +
::::::Yes that is true Theradras was a princess.--[[User:Ashbear160|Ashbear160]] ([[User talk:Ashbear160|talk]]) 03:13, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:13, 21 June 2011

Who is ma'haat? And should we count Ozruk, Therazane called him one of his children.--Ashbear160 (talk) 01:27, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Ma'haat exists. Ozruk may be her child, but he is never called a stone lord, or even implied to be. He also looks very different.--SWM2448 01:37, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
I think she says that her children are the stone lords but i'm not sure.--Ashbear160 (talk) 01:57, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
It sounds like he is a Stone Lord, but became so duty bound that he has lost sight of what hes actually doing... or became corrupted by the Twilight's Hammer. SnakeSssssssssssssssssssssssss Coobra sig3For Pony! (Sssss/Slithered) 02:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
He may or may not be, but in trying to peg down a definition, the potential for a bunch of fallacies is there.--SWM2448 02:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Altrough it's a weak link when the stonemother says "Did I raise you to be fools?" it implies of the stone lords are her children.
And "One of my children is not with me, <name>." "I sent my other children" implies further but it's still pretty dubious.--Ashbear160 (talk) 03:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
The Stone Lords are her children. Their reputation tab says that. However, not all of her children (even major ones) may be Stone Lords.--SWM2448 03:09, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Yes that is true Theradras was a princess.--Ashbear160 (talk) 03:13, 21 June 2011 (UTC)